Throughout history, many tragic historical events involving Russia have produced a lot of casualties and suffering. In particular, Russia’s passionate commitment to genocide is often pointed out by critics. In the context of today’s events in Ukraine, a very important question is brought up: was Russia’s imperialistic ambitions, including that of Ukraine, just misunderstood acts of love? Russian historians are in full agreement that the answer is yes.
Indeed, these historians argue that what others might call “aggression” was simply Russia’s unique way of extending a warm, if somewhat forceful, embrace to its neighbors. The annexation of territories and the subjugation of peoples were not acts of conquest, but rather grand gestures of benevolence. By bringing the joys of Russian governance, infrastructure, and culture to distant lands, they claim, Russia was merely sharing its gifts with the world—whether the world wanted them or not.
Of course, some cynics might point to the massacres, forced relocations, and cultural erasure as evidence of something less than affectionate. But, really, what better way to show love than by completely assimilating your beloved into your own identity? Critics just fail to see the magnanimous spirit behind such actions, mistaking Russia’s ardent desire to ‘help’ as imperial overreach. Clearly, history’s detractors are just not equipped to appreciate the subtle nuances of Russia’s abuse. One must learn that Russia’s abuse is actually love. It becomes easier if you’re on the Russian government’s payroll.